Critical flows, tested in English.
End-to-end tests are the ones that catch real outages and the ones nobody wants to maintain, because they encode a UI that keeps changing.
- No credit card required
- Free plan to start
Why E2E suites decay
- Selectors break on every redesign.
- Flaky tests get muted and then deleted.
- Third-party scripts break flows with no deploy of yours.
- The synthetic monitor checks a status code, not the journey.
How Browza tests
Described, not coded
A sentence replaces a file of selectors, and survives the redesign that would have broken it.
Against production, on a schedule
From the public internet, in a real browser, the way a user arrives.
Failures come with the page
A screenshot and the step history, rather than a stack trace with no context.
It stops where you say
Tell it to stop before payment, and confirm mode guarantees it never completes a purchase.
How you'd call it
A goal and a schema over HTTP — no selectors to maintain and no browser fleet to run.
“POST a run: "Sign up with a test email, confirm you reach the dashboard, and tell me if any step failed."”
Questions people ask
Does this replace my test suite?
No. Unit and integration tests are faster and cheaper for code. This covers the handful of journeys that must work in the real world, where CDNs and third-party scripts live.
Isn't a model slower than Playwright?
Yes, per run. The trade is maintenance: nothing to update when the UI changes. Most teams use it for a few critical flows, not the whole suite.
Will it make real purchases?
Not unless you allow it. Browse-only and confirm modes both prevent it structurally.
Related use cases
What will you hand over?
Start with one task. Watch it run, take the wheel whenever you want, and keep the ones that earn their place.