Critical flows, tested like a customer.
Uptime monitors tell you the server answered. They don't tell you that the checkout button stopped working on mobile, which is the outage that costs money.
- No credit card required
- Free plan to start
Why uptime isn't the answer
- A 200 response says nothing about whether the flow works.
- End-to-end tests are written in code and rot quickly.
- Third-party scripts break flows without any deploy of yours.
- The first report usually comes from a customer.
How Browza checks
Described, not coded
State the flow in a sentence instead of maintaining a test file of selectors.
Every hour, from outside
Runs happen in a real browser on the public internet, the way a customer arrives.
A failure comes with a screenshot
You see the page as it was when it broke, not just an assertion error.
Safe on production
Point it at a test account, and keep it browse-only for anything you don't want it completing.
What you'd actually say
No scripts, no selectors, no configuration screens — you describe the outcome and watch it happen.
“Go to our site, add any product to the cart, start checkout, and tell me if you reach the payment step — stop before paying and screenshot anything that looks broken.”
Questions people ask
Will it complete real purchases?
No — you tell it where to stop, and confirm mode guarantees it parks before anything that spends money.
Does this replace our test suite?
No. Unit and integration tests are cheaper and faster for code. This checks the handful of flows that must work in the real world, where third-party scripts and CDNs live.
How do we get alerted?
Poll the run through the API or watch the agent's history; a failed run is unambiguous and carries its evidence.
Related use cases
What will you hand over?
Start with one task. Watch it run, take the wheel whenever you want, and keep the ones that earn their place.
